复杂性活动1:
词汇复杂性-谓词的多样性
请阅读有关的信息复杂在完成这些活动之前。
- 观看拼图的视频片段和比较任务，并查看两项任务的成绩单。
（1）哪位学习者听起来更流利？为什么？
哪个学习者听起来更准确?为什么？
（3）哪位学习者听起来像她的语言更多种类？为什么？ - 动词的选择会影响句子结构。例如，传递动词需要一个对象，而不及物动词没有。谓词中的更广泛的种类可以是学习者语言中复杂性的一种衡量标准。看看下表，我们计算了各种学习者在每个任务中使用的谓词。哪个学习者整体使用更多各种谓词？这些信息是否符合上文（3）中的猜想？它会改变你对每个学习者熟练程度的印象吗？评论。
| 谓词 | 索菲亚 | 安娜B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拼图 | 比较 | 拼图 | 比较 | |
명사+이다是 |
10. |
2 |
6. |
|
있다存在 |
27. |
2 |
10. |
2 |
많다很多 |
2 |
|||
작다要小 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
좋다是好的 |
2 |
1 |
||
보다看到 |
3. |
3. |
||
不知道모르다 |
1 |
|||
이상하다是奇怪的 |
1 |
|||
살다居住 |
1 |
2 |
||
비싸다是昂贵的 |
1 |
|||
멀다要远远 |
1 |
|||
생각생각思考 |
1 |
|||
만나다见面 |
1 |
1 |
||
다르다是不同的 |
1 |
|||
무섭다害怕 |
1 |
|||
맞다是正确的 |
1 |
|||
싶다想要 |
1 |
|||
拼图
成绩单(PDF)
比较
成绩单(PDF)
请将下列问题的答案打出来。
完成响应后，点击比较你的回答与“学习者语言”员工的回答。
- (1)在给定的视频片段中的Jigsaw任务中，Sophia似乎比Anna B更加流利和自信。但在比较任务的视频剪辑中，安娜B似乎比索菲亚更流利。我们对学习者流利程度的判断依赖于停顿、错误开始的频率等。
（2）很难判断哪一个语言比其他短视频剪辑更准确。安娜Bseems less accurate in the Jigsaw task because she makes an error in the use of a locative particle, and in the Comparison task, she also uses a past tense, ‘안 만났어요 (did not meet)’ instead of ‘만난 적이 없어요 (have not met ever)’ in conjecturing about other people’s experience. In the very next turn in the Comparison task, Sophia accurately uses a prospective tense, ‘안 만날 거예요 (will not meet)’ to express her inference. Considering the situation, that the two learners are making inferences based on given photos, Sophia’s utterances may be more accurate than Anna B’s. But we do not have enough data to be sure.
(3) In the Jigsaw task, Sophia seems to have more complexity in her language than Anna B. In this task, Sophia’s utterances are longer than Anna B’s, and she seems to produce more complex sentences than Anna B. In the Comparison task, the learners sound like they have the same amount of variety in their speech. Both use relative clauses: Anna B says ‘집에 사는 사람들은 (people who live in [the] house)’, and Sophia says ‘돈이 없는 사람 (a person who does not have money)’. -
复杂性与两位学习者的任务有关。索菲亚在拼图任务中使用比Anna B的更多各种谓词，并且Anna B在比较任务中使用比索菲亚的更多各种谓词。
在拼图任务如表所示,索菲亚和安娜B都使用“있다(存在)”和“이다(是)最频繁。尽管索菲亚显示比安B在不同使用谓词的拼图任务,她也使用“있다(存在)大大超过其他谓词。另一方面,而安娜B也使用“있다(存在)经常在拼图任务,她总使用其他谓词接近使用“있다”。在比较任务中，Anna B比Sophia表现出更广泛的谓语多样性，这表明了更复杂的句子结构。
当我们回忆起我们的第一次学习者熟练程度的第一次印象时，Anna B比索菲亚更奇怪的奇异品种更令人惊讶。At first, Sophia sounded more fluent, accurate as well as confident than Anna B. However, the analysis of the variety of predicates the two learners use indicates that Sophia’s apparent fluency and accuracy may result from her repetition of simple sentence structures like the existential expression, ‘있다’. Although Anna B sometimes has longer pauses and hesitations in her speech, she also uses more various predicates than Sophia. Thus, teachers need to be cautious about judging a learner’s proficiency based on their first impressions.
